4.7 Article

Effects of landscape structure on butterfly species richness and abundance in agricultural landscapes in eastern Ontario, Canada

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 123-133

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.05.006

关键词

Landscape structure; Landscape complexity; Habitat fragmentation; Landscape composition; Landscape configuration; Biodiversity

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conversion of land from natural areas to agricultural land-use results in changes in landscape pattern. which may affect the presence and distribution of species within these landscapes. Agricultural landscapes with more cover types (higher compositional heterogeneity) should provide more species with the resources necessary to survive. Landscapes with more complex spatial patterns (higher configurational heterogeneity) should allow organisms to obtain resources more efficiently. The objective of this study was to test the predictions that butterfly richness and abundance will be higher in more heterogeneous agricultural landscapes, where heterogeneity was measured by the number of patch types (patch richness) and the number of patches (patch density) in the landscape. Butterflies were sampled at the centers of 40 landscapes in eastern Ontario, Canada. The landscape variables patch density, patch richness and the amount of butterfly habitat were measured for each landscape at multiple spatial scales. Butterfly species richness was higher in landscapes with more butterfly habitat and higher patch density. In contrast, butterfly abundance was higher in landscapes with lower patch richness. Our results suggest that agricultural and environmental policies aimed at maintaining butterfly diversity and abundance should provide incentives for farmers to maintain landscapes with higher configurational heterogeneity and more butterfly habitat. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据