4.7 Article

Species richness and aboveground carbon stocks in the homegardens of central Kerala, India

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 140, 期 3-4, 页码 430-440

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.006

关键词

Agrobiodiversity; Biomass equations; Carbon sequestration; Homegarden size; Species richness

资金

  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tropical homegardens with high agrobiodiversity have high potential for carbon (C) sequestration, especially under changing environments. Floristic diversity, richness, and aboveground C stocks and how size of homegardens influence agrobiodiversity and C sequestration potential were assessed in the Kerala homegardens. A total of 839 homegardens in 28 panchayaths (lowest unit of local self-government) of Thrissur, Palakkad, and Malappuram districts were surveyed through a stratified random process. Information was gathered on holding size, floristic composition, plant height, and girth at breast height (GBH) of all trees and shrubs (>20 cm GBH). Aboveground C stocks of trees were computed using allometric relationships, assuming C as 50% of biomass. The homegardens were also classified into small (<0.4 ha), medium (0.4-1.2 ha), and large (>1.2 ha). In total, 473 species were recorded, of which 208 were trees (>20 cm GBH), 86 shrubs, and 179 herbs. Simpson's floristic diversity index (0.64, 0.41, and 0.46 for a subset of small, medium, and large homegardens, respectively), species richness, and tree density (per hectare) were highest for small-sized holdings. Large-sized homegardens, however, had more stems per garden. Average aboveground standing stocks of C ranged from 16 to 36 Mg ha(-1), with small homegardens having higher C stocks on unit area basis than large- and medium-sized ones. Implicit in this is the potential for C sequestration and agrobiodiversity conservation, especially by small homegardens. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据