4.7 Review

Salinity and waterlogging as constraints to saltland pasture production: A review

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 129, 期 4, 页码 349-360

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.013

关键词

Salinity; Waterlogging; Land capability assessment; Saltland; Ecological zonation; Economic value

资金

  1. Australian Wool Innovation Limited
  2. Land and Water Australia
  3. Cooperative Research Centre for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review considers the issue of targeting plants for forage/fodder production in landscapes affected by dryland salinity, and two principal factors that affect saltland capability-salinity and waterlogging. Saltland differs in its capacity to support plant growth, and the species used differ in grazing value, so that greatest economic gain will be achieved by focusing revegetation into areas of highest capability. Both salinity and waterlogging are temporally and spatially variable: plant ecological zonation on saltland is a reflection of plant adaptation to these variable stresses. The review has three parts. First, we consider the case for ecological zonation to be caused by variation in salinity and waterlogging. Secondly, we review the current means by which salinity and waterlogging are measured and the suitability of these techniques for rapid field appraisal of saltland capability. Thirdly, we suggest threo critical questions that need to be answered if we are to establish a framework to make rapid saltland capability assessments. These are: (a) can a plant use the groundwater, (b) is the soil water above the water cable suitable for use, and for what period is it sufficient in volume to support growth, and (c) is the soil sufficiently aerobic for root-growth and function. We conclude with some recommendations about: the types of data around which a saltland capability assessment protocol might be designed. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据