4.7 Article

Assessing crop coefficients for Zea mays in the semi-arid Hailiutu River catchment, northwest China

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 37-47

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.03.016

关键词

Maize (Zea mays L.); Evapotranspiration; Sap flow; Penman-Monteith equation; Crop coefficient; Hailiutu River catchment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41172225]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2652012068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve irrigation water-use efficiency, plant transpiration and soil evaporation in a maize (Zea mays L.) field in the Bulang sub-catchment of the Hailiutu River catchment in Northwest China were determined using in situ measurements. Crop transpiration (T-p) rates from Jul 15 to Oct 1, 2011 were measured with sap flow sensors, and soil evaporation (E-P) rates were measured with micro-lysimeters under an absence of water deficit. The two rates together gave the total evapotranspiration (ETc) of the maize field. Cumulative T-p and E-p were 245 and 85 mm, accounting for 74 and 26% of total ETc (330 mm), respectively. To calculate the total ETc rate of the maize field for the entire growing season, the Penman-Monteith equation combined with a single crop coefficient method (FAO-56) was used. The estimated crop coefficient (K-c) was calibrated using actual sap flow and soil evaporation data to provide accurate estimates of actual evapotranspiration. The total crop ETc of the maize field for the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons was 583 and 500 mm, respectively, with a mean daily value of similar to 4 mm d(-1). Groundwater contributed 33% of the maize ETc in 2011 (average groundwater table of 1.12 m with full irrigation) and 27% in 2012 (average groundwater table of 0.89 m with full irrigation). These results will improve precise planning and efficient management of irrigation for maize in this region. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据