4.7 Article

Assessment of groundwater risk using intrinsic vulnerability and hazard mapping: Application to Souassi aquifer, Tunisian Sahel

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 98, 期 10, 页码 1671-1682

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.06.005

关键词

DRASTIC method; Pollution sources; Sensitivity analysis; Nitrate; Sustainable water management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Special attention has been paid to risk assessment in water resource management in arid and semi-arid regions like the Souassi aquifer. Tunisia. Risk assessment, using vulnerability and hazard mapping, is considered as a fundamental aspect of sustainable groundwater management. To determine the degree of risk affecting the study area, an attempt has been made to combine hydro-geologic parameters using the DRASTIC method and the hazard assessment by taking the product of the weighted hazard value (H-I), the ranking factor (Q(N)) and the reduction factor (R-f). All parameters used in this risk assessment were prepared. classified, weighted and integrated in a GIS environment. Data treatment shows that large areas in the Souassi aquifer can be classified as high or very high risk areas corresponding to pollution sources located in high vulnerability zones. The areas with low and very low risk are situated in the south, which could, consequently, be interesting for future development and long term planning of protective measures. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the removal of groundwater depth, net recharge and aquifer media parameters from the DRASTIC index, causes large variation in vulnerability assessment. Moreover, hydraulic conductivity and topography were found to be more effective in assessing aquifer vulnerability. Therefore, they should have higher weights than those assumed by the DRASTIC standard method, and contrary to the impact of the vadose zone parameter. The validity of the DRASTIC and the risk met hods, verified by comparing the distribution of nitrates in the groundwater and the different vulnerability classes, shows a high similarity. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据