4.7 Article

Impact of high-density stocking and selective harvesting on yield and water productivity of deepwater rice-fish systems

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 96, 期 12, 页码 1844-1850

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.006

关键词

Water conservation; Water quality; Rice equivalent yield; Indian major carps; Growth performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examine the productivity of deepwater rice-fish systems and management strategies that include high-density initial stocking and selective harvesting. All species of fish and prawns grow faster after 120 days of rearing, probably due to periodic selective harvesting that minimizes the competition for food and space, as well as physiological stress at reduced density. We observe a higher survival rate, a lower apparent feed conversion ratio (1.77) and higher fish yield (14.1%) in rice-fish culture with selective harvesting (T-1) than in rice-fish culture without selective harvesting (T-2). The highest paddy yield was recorded in T-1, primarily due to the higher number of panicles per m(2) (139.5) and the number of filled grains per panicle (111.5). The increase in paddy yield over rice mono-cropping was higher in T-1 (25%) than T-2 (16.9%). The smaller number of panicles (122.2/m(2)) and filled grains (98.5 per panicle) in rice mono-cropping was probably due to the absence of fish and prawns in the field as fish and prawns improve soil fertility, recover lost energy, and adjust energy flow by consuming plankton, weeds, insects and bacteria that compete with rice for nutrients. The highest rice equivalent yield (38.5 t ha(-1)), the output value-cultivation cost ratio (1.56) and net water productivity (Rs. 7.30/m(3)) in deepwater rice-fish culture was recorded when selective harvesting was practiced. This eco-friendly dual production system (rice and fish) and on-dyke horticulture, which generate near-term lucrative returns and generates employment opportunities, can be adopted and expanded in lowlands and waterlogged areas. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据