4.7 Article

A comparison of WEPP and SWAT for modeling soil erosion of the Zhangjiachong Watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 96, 期 10, 页码 1435-1442

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.04.017

关键词

Sediment yield; Runoff; MUSLE; Sensitivity analysis; Calibration; Validation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40771193]
  2. Nonprofit Environment Protection Specific Project [200709024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil and water conservation is important for the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China, and quantification of soil loss is a significant issue. In this study, two widely used models - the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) - were applied to simulate runoff and sediment yield for the Zhangjiachong Watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. The models were run and the simulated runoff and sediment yield values were compared with the measured runoff and sediment yield values. In the calibration period, the model efficiency (E-NS) values for the WEPP and SWAT were 0.864 and 0.711 for runoff, and 0.847 and 0.678 for sediment yield, respectively. In the validation period, the E-NS values for WEPP and SWAT were 0.835 and 0.690 for runoff, and 0.828 and 0.818 for sediment yield, respectively. The results of E-NS and the other criteria indicate that the results of both models were acceptable. WEPP simulations were better than SWAT in most cases, and could be used with a reasonable confidence for soil loss quantification in the Zhangjiachong Watershed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据