4.7 Article

Impact of vancomycin faecal concentrations on clinical and microbiological outcomes in Clostridium difficile infection

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.03.016

关键词

Vancomycin; Faecal concentration; Pharmacokinetics; Clostridium difficile; Colonisation

资金

  1. Center for Anti-infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital (Hartford, CT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the impact of faecal vancomycin concentrations on clinical and microbiological outcomes in patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and whether these concentrations vary with stool consistency and frequency, faecal concentrations of vancomycin were measured in stools collected at various times from patients initiated on 125 mg every 6 h (q6h) for 10 days. Stool consistency and frequency were determined over the course of therapy. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were assessed during therapy, at the end of therapy (EOT) and during a 19-38-day follow-up visit. Faecal vancomycin concentrations in 55 stool samples from 15 patients ranged from 175-6299 mu g/g at Days 3-5 of therapy (midpoint), 17-5277 mu g/g at EOT and 0-70 mu g/g at follow-up. Clinical cure or failure at EOT and at follow-up was not dependent on vancomycin concentrations measured at the midpoint (P = 0.72) or at EOT (P = 0.76). Likewise, concentrations at EOT and at follow-up did not predict colonisation at follow-up (P = 0.85 and 0.71, respectively). Faecal vancomycin concentrations during the course of therapy (Days 3-5) did not differ with either stool consistency or frequency (P = 0.94 and 0.16, respectively). However, after completion of therapy, patients with more frequent stools showed higher concentrations than patients with less frequent stools (P = 0.04). Oral vancomycin 125 mg q6h led to faecal concentrations that did not predict clinical outcomes of CDI in terms of cure or gut colonisation and did not vary with stool consistency and frequency. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据