4.7 Article

Long-term versus daily stem diameter variation in co-occurring mangrove species: Environmental versus ecophysiological drivers

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 51-58

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.03.002

关键词

Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh.; Dendrometer; Mangrove; Rhizophora stylosa Griff.; Stem diameter variation; Water use

资金

  1. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO)
  2. National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training - Centre of Excellence of the Australian Research Council
  3. National Water Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High temporal resolution stem diameter variation (SDV) patterns have been widely recognized as a tool to study fundamental plant physiological mechanisms underlying whole-plant functioning and growth. As an integrative response to hydraulic and carbon related processes, SDV research has greatly improved insights in plant functioning of several herbaceous and woody species. Nevertheless, to date little detailed information on SDV and related physiological processes is available for mangrove species. By measuring continuous tree physiological variables such as stem diameter variations, sap flow and stem water potential in relation to the microclimatic conditions, the water use strategies of two co-occurring mangrove species, Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh. and Rhizophora stylosa Griff. were investigated. Even though both species showed a similar long-term growth trend, closely linked to the environmental conditions, their daily SDV pattern was markedly different. While for Avicennia marina the SDV showed the standard daily pattern of morning decline and evening rise, the opposite daily SDV pattern was observed for Rbizophora stylosa. The contrasting patterns of SDV in both species thriving in the same environment indicates the importance and complexity of physiological endogenous mechanisms in addition to environmental conditions in controlling SDV and radial stem growth. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据