4.7 Article

A comparison of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide and evapotranspiration for treed and open portions of a temperate peatland

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 45-53

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.06.006

关键词

Net ecosystem exchange; Net primary production; Evapotranspiration; Bog; Black spruce; Ericaceous shrubs

资金

  1. Ontario Graduate Scholarship program
  2. Carleton University
  3. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide (NEE) and evapotranspiration (ET) were measured at open and treed portions of a temperate ombrotrophic bog using the eddy covariance technique to examine the potential influence of plant community characteristics on peatland carbon and water vapour exchange. The sites were located 2.7 km from each other within the same peatland complex and thus experienced similar weather. Both sites were characterized by a Sphagnum ground cover and a shrub layer with similar total biomass. However, at the treed bog, 35% of this understory vascular plant layer was made up of Picea mariana (<0.5 m tall) compared to less than 0.2% in the open bog. The treed bog was also characterized by an overstory dominated by a patchy distribution of stunted P. mariana. Over a single year, net CO2 uptake and ET was lower at the treed bog (NEE: -72 g C m(-2) year(-1) and ET: 449 mm year(-1)) than at the open bog (NEE: -104 g C m(-2) year(-1) and ET: 493 mm year(-1)). Chamber measurements revealed that P. mariana was associated with low rates of net primary productivity (NPP) compared to the relatively more productive ericaceous and deciduous shrubs. Although the presence of a P. mariana overstory increases both the total aboveground biomass and leaf area index in this peatland, P. mariana appears to be important in reducing both ecosystem-scale carbon sequestration and water vapour loss. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据