4.7 Article

Modeling approaches to estimate effective leaf area index from aerial discrete-return LIDAR

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
卷 149, 期 6-7, 页码 1152-1160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.007

关键词

Leaf area index; LIDAR; Hemispherical photographs; Urban forest; Modeling; Vegetation

资金

  1. Royalty Research Fund at the Univ. of Washington

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leaf area index (LAI) has traditionally been difficult to estimate accurately at the landscape scale, especially in heterogeneous vegetation with a range in LAI, but remains an important parameter for many ecological models. Several different methods have recently been proposed to estimate LAI using aerial light detection and ranging (LIDAR), but few systematic approaches have been attempted to assess the performance of these methods using a large, independent dataset with a wide range of LAI in a heterogeneous, mixed forest. In this study, four modeling approaches to estimate LAI using aerial discrete-return LIDAR have been compared to 98 separate hemispherical photograph LAI estimates from a heterogeneous mixed forest with a wide range of LAI. Among the four approaches tested, the model based on the Beer-Lambert law with a single parameter (k: extinction coefficient) exhibited highest accuracy (r(2) = 0.665) compared with the other models based on allometric relationships. It is shown that the theoretical k value (=0.5) assuming a spherical leaf angle distribution and the zenith angle of vertical beams (=0 degrees) may be adequate to estimate effective LAI of vegetation using LIDAR data. This model was then applied to six 30 m x 30 m plots at differing spatial extents to investigate the relationship between plot size and model accuracy, observing that model accuracy increased with increasing spatial extent, with a maximum r(2) of 0.78 at an area of 900 m(2). Findings of the present study can provide useful information for selection and application of LIDAR derived LAI models at landscape or other spatial scales of ecological importance. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据