4.3 Article

Conophthorin enhances the electroantennogram and field behavioural response of Xylosandrus germanus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to ethanol

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 327-334

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/afe.12062

关键词

Ambrosia beetle; conophthorin; Xylosandrus

资金

  1. USDA-ARS Floriculture and Nursery Research Initiative
  2. USDA-APHIS' [12-8130-0196-CA]
  3. ARS (National Program 304-Crop Protection and Quarantine) [3607-22000-012-00D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethanol acts as an attractant that aids Xylosandrus germanus (Blandford) in locating living but weakened hosts. Electroantennogram (EAG) and field trapping experiments were conducted with conophthorin and other selected semiochemicals that function as important olfactory cues for various ambrosia beetles to characterize their effect on the attraction of X. germanus to ethanol and to assess whether EAG responses provide an indication of behavioural activity. Thus, semiochemicals hypothesized to enhance (i.e. conophthorin), reduce (i.e. terpinolene, verbenone) or have a negligible (i.e. lineatin, sulcatol, retusol) effect on the attraction of X. germanus to ethanol were selected for comparative purposes. Ethanol plus conophthorin elicited larger EAG amplitudes than binary (1:1) mixtures of ethanol plus the remaining semiochemicals at dilutions of 0.001%, 0.01% and 1% per compound. Conophthorin also enhanced the attraction of X. germanus, Euwallacea validus (Eichhoff) and Cyclorhipidion pelliculosum (Eichhoff) to ethanol under field conditions. By contrast, terpinolene and verbenone reduced the attraction of X. germanus and other ambrosia beetles to ethanol. Semiochemicals that enhance (i.e. conophthorin) or reduce (i.e. terpinolene, verbenone) attraction by X. germanus may improve monitoring and/or management tactics. These results also suggest that EAG responses can indicate field behavioural activity and be useful for screening attractants for X. germanus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据