4.6 Article

Genome-wide profiling of the microRNA-mRNA regulatory network in skeletal muscle with aging

期刊

AGING-US
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 524-544

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100677

关键词

Skeletal muscle; aging; microRNA profiling; imprinted Dlk1-Dio3; microRNA cluster; novel microRNA

资金

  1. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korean government (MSIP) [20110030133, 2013M3A9B6076413, 2012M3A9B4027954]
  2. KRIBB Research Initiative Program
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M3A9B4027954] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skeletal muscle degenerates progressively, losing mass (sarcopenia) over time, which leads to reduced physical ability and often results in secondary diseases such as diabetes and obesity. The regulation of gene expression by microRNAs is a key event in muscle development and disease. To understand genome-wide changes in microRNAs and mRNAs during muscle aging, we sequenced microRNAs and mRNAs from mouse gastrocnemius muscles at two different ages (6 and 24 months). Thirty-four microRNAs (15 up-regulated and 19 down-regulated) were differentially expressed with age, including the microRNAs miR-206 and -434, which were differentially expressed in aged muscle in previous studies. Interestingly, eight microRNAs in a microRNA cluster at the imprinted Dlk1-Dio3 locus on chromosome 12 were coordinately down-regulated. In addition, sixteen novel microRNAs were identified. Integrative analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression revealed that microRNAs may contribute to muscle aging through the positive regulation of transcription, metabolic processes, and kinase activity. Many of the age-related microRNAs have been implicated in human muscular diseases. We suggest that genome-wide microRNA profiling will expand our knowledge of microRNA function in the muscle aging process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据