4.6 Article

The mRNA decay factor tristetraprolin (TTP) induces senescence in human papillomavirus-transformed cervical cancer cells by targeting E6-AP ubiquitin ligase

期刊

AGING-US
卷 1, 期 9, 页码 803-817

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100086

关键词

tristetraprolin; senescence; AU-rich element; HPV; E6-AP

资金

  1. NIH
  2. NIH/NCI [P20-RR17698]
  3. American Cancer Society Research Scholar [RSG-06-122-01-CNE]
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA134609] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P20RR017698] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The RNA-binding protein tristetraprolin (TTP) regulates expression of many cancer-associated and pro-inflammatory factors through binding AU-rich elements (ARE) in the 3'-untranslated region (3' UTR) and facilitating rapid mRNA decay. Here we report on the ability of TTP to act in an anti-proliferative capacity in HPV18-positive HeLa cells by inducing senescence. HeLa cells maintain a dormant p53 pathway and elevated telomerase activity resulting from HPV mediated transformation, whereas TTP expression counteracted this effect by stabilizing p53 protein and inhibiting hTERT expression. Presence of TTP did not alter E6 and E7 viral mRNA levels indicating that these are not TTP targets. It was found that TTP promoted rapid mRNA decay of the cellular ubiquitin ligase E6-associated protein (E6-AP). RNA-binding studies demonstrated TTP and E6-AP mRNA interaction and deletion of the E6-AP mRNA ARE-containing 3' UTR imparts resistance to TTP-mediated downregulation. Similar results were obtained with high-risk HPV16-positive cells that employ the E6-AP pathway to control p53 and hTERT levels. Furthermore, loss of TTP expression was consistently observed in cervical cancer tissue compared to normal tissue. These findings demonstrate the ability of TTP to act as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting the E6-AP pathway and indicate TTP loss to be a critical event during HPV-mediated carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据