4.2 Article

Gender-dependent variations in systemic biomarkers of oxidative protein, DNA, and lipid damage in aged rats

期刊

AGING MALE
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 51-58

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13685530903236470

关键词

Aging; plasma; gender; protein oxidation; DNA oxidation; lipid peroxidation

资金

  1. Research Fund of The University of Istanbul [UDP-4041/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction. The effect of aging on plasma-protein, lipid and DNA oxidation is well documented. However, none of the studies specify the effect of gender. The purpose of this study is to clarify the ambiguity raised in preliminary reports as to gender dependency of oxidative damage in plasma. Methods. In the current study, we investigated the relation between 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine levels (8-OHdG), which is a measure of DNA oxidation and protein oxidation parameters such as protein carbonyl (PCO), total thiol (T-SH), and advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP). Our study also covered other oxidative stress parameters, such as lipid hydroperoxides (LHP), malondialdehyde (MDA), erythrocyte glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (Cu-Zn SOD) and the catalase (CAT) activity in plasma of the male and female aged rats. Results. 8-OHdG and MDA levels in male rats were significantly higher than those in the female group (p < 0.01 for both parameters). T-SH levels were found to be higher in female rats than in the male (p < 0.05). Plasma Cu-Zn SOD activities of male rats were significantly higher compared with those of the female rats (p < 0.05). On the other hand, PCO, AOPP, LHP, GSH levels, and CAT activity were not found to be different between genders. Conclusions. We suggest that increased T-SH levels found in female rats may point to an adaptive reaction to oxidative damage, reflecting 8-OHdG and MDA overproduction. We are of the conviction that the increased 8-OHdG and MDA that we have determined in aged male rats may be a risk factor in the extent of oxidation in plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据