4.7 Article

Combined treatment of rapamycin and dietary restriction has a larger effect on the transcriptome and metabolome of liver

期刊

AGING CELL
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 311-319

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acel.12175

关键词

dietary restriction; metabolome; rapamycin; transcriptome

资金

  1. San Antonio Nathan Shock Aging Center [1p30-AG-13319]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) RC2 Grand Opportunity grant [AG036613]
  3. NIH T32 Training Grant [AG021890]
  4. Ellison Medical Foundation
  5. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapamycin (Rapa) and dietary restriction (DR) have consistently been shown to increase lifespan. To investigate whether Rapa and DR affect similar pathways in mice, we compared the effects of feeding mice ad libitum (AL), Rapa, DR, or a combination of Rapa and DR (Rapa+DR) on the transcriptome and metabolome of the liver. The principal component analysis shows that Rapa and DR are distinct groups. Over 2500 genes are significantly changed with either Rapa or DR when compared with mice fed AL; more than 80% are unique to DR or Rapa. A similar observation was made when genes were grouped into pathways; two-thirds of the pathways were uniquely changed by DR or Rapa. The metabolome shows an even greater difference between Rapa and DR; no metabolites in Rapa-treated mice were changed significantly from AL mice, whereas 173 metabolites were changed in the DR mice. Interestingly, the number of genes significantly changed by Rapa+DR when compared with AL is twice as large as the number of genes significantly altered by either DR or Rapa alone. In summary, the global effects of DR or Rapa on the liver are quite different and a combination of Rapa and DR results in alterations in a large number of genes and metabolites that are not significantly changed by either manipulation alone, suggesting that a combination of DR and Rapa would be more effective in extending longevity than either treatment alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据