4.5 Article

Categorical structure among shared features in networks of early-learned nouns

期刊

COGNITION
卷 112, 期 3, 页码 381-396

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.002

关键词

Early semantic network; Clusters; Perceptual and functional features; Percolation algorithm; Feature correlations

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD028675-14, T32 HD007475, HD 07475, T32 HD007475-15, T32 HD007475-13, R01 HD028675] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH 60200, R01 MH060200, R01 MH060200-09] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The shared features that characterize the noun categories that young children learn first are a formative basis of the human category system. To investigate the potential categorical information contained in the features of early-learned nouns, we examine the graph-theoretic properties of noun-feature networks. The networks are built from the overlap of words normatively acquired by children prior to 2(1/2) years of age and perceptual and conceptual (functional) features acquired from adult feature generation norms. The resulting networks have small-world structure, indicative of a high degree of feature overlap in local clusters. However, perceptual features - due to their abundance and redundancy - generate networks more robust to feature omissions, while conceptual features are more discriminating and, per feature, offer more categorical information than perceptual features. Using a network specific cluster identification algorithm (the clique percolation method) we also show that shared features among these early-learned nouns create higher-order groupings common to adult taxonomic designations. Again, perceptual and conceptual features play distinct roles among different categories, typically with perceptual features being more inclusive and conceptual features being more exclusive of category memberships. The results offer new and testable hypotheses about the role of shared features in human category knowledge. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据