4.7 Article

Increased effect of the ApoE gene on survival at advanced age in healthy and long-lived Danes: two nationwide cohort studies

期刊

AGING CELL
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 1004-1009

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00626.x

关键词

ApoE; frailty; heterogenity; longevity; mortality; oldest old

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG008761, P01 AG008761-19] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Studies of Nordic twins suggest an increased genetic influence on mortality with age. Contrary to this, the heterogeneity hypothesis predicts that the mortality of individuals carrying a 'frail' or 'risky' genotype in a population will approach that of noncarriers with age because of selection pressure. The ApoE epsilon 4 allele is associated with an increased mortality risk, and its effect has been suggested to decrease with age. Here, we investigated the effect of ApoE epsilon 4 allele on survival in a sample of the healthiest and long-lived Danes. The study population comprised Danes born in 1905 and a replicate sample of the 1895 cohort. For the 1905 cohort, a total of 350 carriers and 1256 noncarriers of the ApoE epsilon 4 allele were followed from 1998 until death or end of follow-up. Cox regression models were used for the analysis. Of the 1606 persons with known ApoE epsilon 4 status in 1998, 1546 had died at the end of the 10-year follow-up. Carriers of the ApoE epsilon 4 allele had an increased mortality compared to noncarriers, and the influence of ApoE status on mortality increased in the age interval 92-103. For the covariates sex and independency status, the difference in relative risk of death between groups decreased with advancing age. Our findings of increasing influence of ApoE epsilon 4 allele on mortality with age do not support previous findings of decreased influence ApoE epsilon 4 allele on mortality with age, and alternative models such as the multifactorial threshold models should be considered for understanding the genetic effects on mortality at advanced age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据