4.7 Article

Integrating ontological modelling and Bayesian inference for pattern classification in topographic vector data

期刊

COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 363-374

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.07.005

关键词

Pattern recognition; Spatial database enrichment; Ontology; Bayesian network; Supervised classification; Building types

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an ontology-driven approach for spatial database enrichment in support of map generalisation. Ontology-driven spatial database enrichment is a promising means to provide better transparency, flexibility and reusability in comparison to purely algorithmic approaches. Geographic concepts manifested in spatial patterns are formalised by means of ontologies that are used to trigger appropriate low level pattern recognition techniques. The paper focuses on inference in the presence of vagueness, which is common in definitions of spatial phenomena, and on the influence of the complexity of spatial measures on classification accuracy. The concept of the English terraced house serves as an example to demonstrate how geographic concepts can be modelled in an ontology for spatial database enrichment. Owing to their good integration into ontologies. and their ability to deal with vague definitions, supervised Bayesian inference is used for inferring complex concepts. The approach is validated in experiments using large vector datasets representing buildings of four different cities. We compare classification results obtained with the proposed approach to results produced by a more traditional ontology approach. The proposed approach performed considerably better in comparison to the traditional ontology approach. Besides clarifying the benefits of using ontologies in spatial database enrichment, our research demonstrates that Bayesian networks are a suitable method to integrate vague knowledge about conceptualisations in cartography and GIScience. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据