4.1 Article

An audit of potentially recyclable waste from anaesthetic practice

期刊

ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 820-823

出版社

AUSTRALIAN SOC ANAESTHETISTS
DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0903700521

关键词

anaesthesia; waste products; pollution; recycling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about the amount of anaesthesia waste that is recyclable. We tested the hypotheses: 1) that anaesthetists produce a small proportion (<10%) of total operating suite waste, 2) that much of this waste (>30%) is recyclable and 3) that there is little (<10%) cross-contamination of infectious and non-infectious waste. For five weekdays in a metropolitan hospital with six operating theatres, we weighed waste and determined the proportion of anaesthesia waste that was recyclable. Waste was routinely divided into general and infectious streams. For safety reasons the infectious waste was considered unavailable for recycling, leaving the general waste as potentially recyclable. Anaesthesia waste (90 kg) was 25% (95% confidence interval: 22 to 29%) of the total 357 kg of operating suite waste. Of 66 kg of general anaesthesia waste, 38 kg was recyclable (58%; 95% confidence interval: 47 to 67%). Most cardboard waste, however, was included in the operating suite waste; therefore we under estimated the total amount of recyclable anaesthesia waste. Of 24 kg of anaesthesia infectious waste, 2 kg (8%) was recyclable. The general waste contained 4 kg (7%; 95% confidence interval: 3 to 13%) of infectious items. No sharps were found. Anaesthesia waste was a quarter of total operating suite waste. Almost 60% of anaesthesia general waste could be recycled. Failure to eliminate infectious waste from general waste could be a barrier to recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据