4.7 Article

A Census-based longitudinal study of variations in survival amongst residents of nursing and residential homes in Northern Ireland

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 711-717

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afp173

关键词

residential facilities; mortality; aged; longitudinal studies; elderly

资金

  1. Research and Development Office of the Northern Ireland Health and Social Services Central Services Agency
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Public Health Agency [EAT/3444/06] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. ESRC [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: to quantify mortality rates across the care home population of Northern Ireland, and assess variation by type of care home and resident characteristics. Design: a prospective, Census-based cohort study, with 5-year follow-up. Participants: all 9,072 residents of care homes for people aged 65 and over at the time of the 2001 census with a special emphasis on the 2,112 residents admitted during the year preceding census day. Measurements: age, sex, self-reported health, marital status, residence (not in care home, residential home, dual registered home, nursing home), elderly mentally infirm care provision. Results: the median survival among nursing home residents was 2.33 years (95% CI 2.25-2.59), for dual registered homes 2.75 (95% CI 2.42-3.17) and for residential homes 4.51 (95% CI 3.92-4.92) years. Age, sex and self-reported health showed weaker associations in the sicker populations in nursing homes compared to those in residential care or among the non-institutionalised. Conclusions: the high mortality in care homes indicates that places in care homes are reserved for the most severely ill and dependent. Death rates may not be an appropriate care quality measure for this population, but may serve as a useful adjunct for clinical staff and the planning of care home provision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据