4.0 Article

Influence of endothelial dysfunction on telomere length in subjects with metabolic syndrome: LIPGENE study

期刊

AGE
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-014-9681-9

关键词

Endothelial dysfunction; LIPGENE study; Metabolic syndrome; Oxidative stress; Telomeres

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [AGL2006-01979, AGL2009-12270]
  2. 'Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion' is an ISCIII [CB06/03/0047-CIBER]
  3. Consejeria de Innovacion
  4. Ciencia y Empresa
  5. Junta de Andalucia [P06-CTS-01425, CVI-7450]
  6. Consejeria de Salud, Junta de Andalucia [06/128, 07/43, PI0193/2009, 06/129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous evidences support that increased oxidative stress (OxS) may play an important role in metabolic syndrome (MetS) and both are closely linked to vascular dysfunction. This study determined whether there is a relationship between endothelial function and relative telomere length (RTL) in MetS subjects. In this cross-sectional study from the LIPGENE cohort, a total of 88 subjects (36 men and 52 women) were divided into four groups by quartiles of telomere length. We measured ischemic reactive hyperemia (IRH), total nitrite (NO) and protein carbonyl (PC) plasma levels, F2-isoprostanes urinary levels, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) plasma activities. IRH and NO plasma levels were higher in subjects with longer RTL (quartiles 3 and 4), while PC plasma levels, F2-isoprostanes urinary levels, and GPx and SOD plasma activities were lower in quartile 4 subjects (longest RTL). Additionally, MetS subjects with longer RTL had greater homeostatic model assessment-beta level and lower triglycerides plasma levels. Our results suggest that endothelial dysfunction, associated with high levels of OxS, could be entailed in an increment of telomere attrition. Thus, further support of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in vascular dysfunction may contribute to the development of strategies to decelerate vascular aging or prevent cardiovascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据