4.1 Article

Design and calibration of an acoustic telemetry system subject to upwelling events

期刊

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 355-364

出版社

NATL INQUIRY SERVICES CENTRE PTY LTD
DOI: 10.2989/AJMS.2009.31.3.8.996

关键词

acoustic telemetry; isothermal; system saturation; thermocline; transmitter range

资金

  1. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
  2. Rhodes University
  3. National Research Foundation
  4. South African Squid Management Industrial Association
  5. Bayworld Centre for Research and Education
  6. Marine and Coastal Management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experiments described were designed to calibrate a hexagonal array of VEMCO VR2 receivers and transmitters (model V9P-6L-S256) in isothermal and stratified water columns off the south coast of South Africa. The array, configured with 500 m between receivers, was designed to study the influence of water temperature and turbidity on the spawning behaviour of chokka squid Loligo reynaudii. Range tests comprised fixing a single VR2 receiver 2 m from the seabed and placing a V9P transmitter at distances of 0 m, 75 m, 150 m, 225 m, 300 m, 375 m, 450 m and 500 m from the receiver for periods of 10 minutes at each position under isothermal conditions and in the presence of a thermocline. The data indicated a range of 300 m for the former and 75 m for the latter conditions. The field performance of the V9P transmitter in a non-stratified water column compared well with the theoretical range of 352 m calculated using software to calculate range. System saturation was investigated by repeating the range test using four, eight and 14 transmitters simultaneously. Field data indicated a significant decrease in signal detections due to signal collisions when more than eight transmitters were active simultaneously. It was demonstrated that the hexagonal configuration of VR2s is optimal during isothermal conditions but inadequate during stratified conditions when acoustic dead zones of 350 m between VR2 receivers can occur.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据