4.6 Article

A multi-objective memetic algorithm for integrated process planning and scheduling

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-8037-7

关键词

Integrated process planning and scheduling (IPPS); Multi-objective optimization; Multi-objective memetic algorithm; Variable neighborhood search; Intensification search

资金

  1. Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51561125002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51275190, 51575211]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST:2014TS038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Process planning and scheduling are two crucial components in a manufacturing system. The integration of the two functions has an important significance on improving the performance of the manufacturing system. However, integrated process planning and scheduling is an intractable non-deterministic polynomial-time (NP)-hard problem, and the multiple objectives requirement widely exists in real-world production situations. In this paper, a multi-objective mathematical model of integrated process planning and scheduling is set up with three different objectives: the overall finishing time (makespan), the maximum machine workload (MMW), and the total workload of machines (TWM). A multi-objective memetic algorithm (MOMA) is proposed to solve this problem. In MOMA, all the possible schedules are improved by a problem-specific multi-objective local search method, which combines a variable neighborhood search (VNS) procedure and an effective objective-specific intensification search method. Moreover, we adopt the TOPSIS method to select a satisfactory schedule scheme from the optimal Pareto front. The proposed MOMA is tested on typical benchmark instances and the experimental results are compared with those obtained by the well-known NSGA-II. Computational results show that MOMA is a promising and very effective method for the multi-objective IPPS problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据