4.5 Article

Nitrogen Influences Biomass and Nutrient Partitioning by Perennial, Warm-Season Grasses

期刊

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
卷 101, 期 6, 页码 1363-1371

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0225x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMS0424700]
  2. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture
  3. ISU Plant Sciences Institute
  4. ISU Department of Agronomy
  5. SU Department of Agriculture and Biosystems Engineering
  6. ConocoPhillips Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent attention has focused on the use of perennial, warm-season grasses as renewable energy crops. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of N fertilization on partitioning of biomass and nutrients between above- and belowground plant components by four warm-season grass species in Iowa. In 2006-2007, established stands of big bluestem (Andropogon geradii Vitman), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), indiangrass [Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash], and eastern gamagrass [Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L.] were fertilized with 0, 65, 140, or 220 kg N ha(-1) in the spring and harvested following frost in the fall. Dependent on grass species and year, yield response to N was linear or quadratic. Optimum yield after 2 yr was 13.5 Mg ha(-1) at 140 kg N ha(-1) for all grasses except eastern gamagrass, which demonstrated lower yield and a consistent linear N response. Nitrogen inputs had pronounced but grass-specific effects on root biomass and nutrient partitioning. For big bluestem and switchgrass, 140 kg N ha(-1) maximized root biomass and favored allocation of nutrients to roots over shoots. In contrast, for indiangrass and eastern gamagrass, root biomass and root nutrient allocation were adversely affected by N inputs. For all grasses, 220 kg N ha(-1) shifted allocation of nutrients to shoots over roots. Selection of crops and management practices that optimize Yield, and maintain a high level of resource partitioning to roots at low to intermediate N input rates will promote the development of productive and efficient bioenergy systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据