4.7 Article

Simulating unsteady aerodynamics of helicopter rotor with panel/viscous vortex particle method

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 255-268

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2013.08.010

关键词

Unsteady panel method; Viscous vortex particle method; Unsteady aerodynamics; Helicopter rotor; Rotor wake

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unsteady aerodynamics of a helicopter rotor has been a central issue in the field of rotorcraft aerodynamics. This is because the rotor generates a complex time-dependent pattern of vorticity in its wake, which has significant effects on its performance, stability, loading, and vibration. Conventional free-wake methods used in most of the current comprehensive rotorcraft analysis codes are limited by the potential flow assumption and empirical formulations, such as vortex core size. Based on a numerical solution of the unsteady fluid-dynamic equations governing transportation and diffusion of vorticity, a viscous vortex particle method is coupled with an unsteady panel method to predict the unsteady aerodynamics of helicopter rotor blades with fewer empirical formulations in viscous flow. The coupled method is implemented through the trailing-edge Kutta condition, Neumann boundary condition, and by converting shed-wake doublet panels to wake vorticity. A TreeCode method is also employed to reduce computational cost for practical analysis. Helicopter rotors including the scaled model, Caradonna Tung, and AH-1G rotors are simulated in hover and forward flight to validate the accuracy of the present approach. The unsteady dynamics of the rotor wake, such as wake contraction, tip-vortex pairing, and vortex roll-up, are well simulated. The predicted inflow distribution is more accurate than that in the conventional free-wake method, and the predicted pressure coefficient distribution and unsteady aerodynamic loads of rotor blades agree well with measured data and computational fluid-dynamics results. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据