4.7 Article

Design and aerodynamic analysis of a flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 383-392

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2009.07.007

关键词

Planar membrane wing; Flapping wing; MAV

资金

  1. ITRI, ROC
  2. National Science Council in Taiwan [NSC 94-2212-E-216-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the design and aerodynamic performance of a planar membrane wing as shape airfoil for the micro aerial vehicle. This simulation calculates the average lift force, (L) over bar as the criteria weight of the flapping wing (weight must be lower than 8.78 g), to make one ultra-light, small size flapping wing MAV. In here two phases are discussed. First, the 3D aerodynamic calculation and flow field simulation of a planar membrane wing as shape airfoil for a MAV were studied. Analyzing the flapping wing under different frequencies and angles of attack, investigates the pressure distribution, the airfoil-tip vortex and the up-wash situation of the air flow. Second is to average lift force, (L) over bar 8.78 g for designing weight limit of the MAV. The specifications of flapping wing MAV are 8 g gross weight, the 15 cm wingspan, and 5 cm chord length. In this vehicle, we employed the concept of four-bar linkage to design a flapping mechanism which simulates the flapping motion of a bird. The angles of upstroke and downstroke can be varied in the design. The total flapping angle is 73 degrees. The flapping frequency of wing is 25.58 Hz. The power source comes from motor with a Li-H battery. A simple flight test was carried out and the result of the flight is going well. The actual flight distance is approximately 8 m, and the primary goal is achieved. By the way, we found the rigidity of tail wing is crucial and should be enhanced to prevent the flapping-wing MAV will be unable to revise if the MAV in a crooked condition and it will cause a crash. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据