4.6 Article

Topology optimization of multiscale elastoviscoplastic structures

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5122

关键词

topology design; potential-based reduced basis model order reduction (pRBMOR); bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO); multiscale analysis; nonlinear homogenization; graphics processing unit (GPU)

资金

  1. French Government [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [DFG-FR2702/3, DFG-FR2702/6]
  3. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) via the Excellence Initiative of DFG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper extends current concepts of topology optimization to the design of structures made of nonlinear microheterogeneous materials. The objective is to maximize the macroscopic structural stiffness for a prescribed material volume usage while accounting for the nonlinearity and the microstructure of the material. The resulting design problem considers two scales: the macroscopic scale at which the optimization is performed and the microscopic scale at which the material heterogeneities and the nonlinearities are observed. The topology optimization at the macroscopic scale is performed by means of the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method. The solution of the macroscopic boundary value problem requires as inputs the effective constitutive response with full consideration of the microstructure. While computational homogenization methods such as the FE2 method could be used to solve the nonlinear multiscale problem, the associated numerical expense (CPU time and memory) is highly unacceptable. In order to regain the computational feasibility of the computational scale transition, a recent model reduction technique of the authors is employed: the potential-based reduced basis model order reduction with graphics processing unit acceleration. Numerical examples show the efficiency of the resulting nonlinear two-scale designs. The impact of different load amplitudes on the design is examined. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据