4.5 Article

Impacts of Aerosol Aging on Laser Desorption/Ionization in Single-Particle Mass Spectrometers

期刊

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 1050-1058

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2014.955907

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-ATM 0321362]
  2. California Air Resources Board [CARB 04-336]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships
  4. EPA STAR Graduate Fellowships
  5. DOE [BER/ASRDE-SC0006035]
  6. CARB [11-305]
  7. NOAA [NA13OAR4310063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-particle mass spectrometry (SPMS) has been widely used for characterizing the chemical mixing state of ambient aerosol particles. However, processes occurring during particle ablation and ionization can influence the mass spectra produced by these instruments. These effects remain poorly characterized for complex atmospheric particles. During the 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols in Riverside (SOAR), a thermodenuder was used to evaporate the more volatile aerosol species in sequential temperature steps up to 230 degrees C; the residual aerosol particles were sampled by an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) and a single-particle aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ATOFMS). Removal of the secondary species (e.g., ammonium nitrate/sulfate) through heating permitted assessment of the change in ionization patterns as the composition changed for a given particle type. It was observed that a coating of secondary species can reduce the ionization efficiency by changing the degree of laser absorption or particle ablation, which significantly impacted the measured ion peak areas. Nonvolatile aerosol components were used as pseudo-internal standards (or reference components) to correct for this LDI effect. Such corrected ATOFMS ion peak areas correlated well with the AMS measurements of the same species up to 142 degrees C. This work demonstrates the potential to accurately relate SPMS peak areas to the mass of specific aerosol components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据