4.5 Review

Monolayer and Multilayer Particle Deposits on Hard Surfaces: Literature Review and Implications for Particle Resuspension in the Indoor Environment

期刊

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 8, 页码 831-847

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2013.794928

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-1110007]
  2. National Science Foundation IGERT [DGE-0549428]
  3. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers Graduate Student Grant-in-Aid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle deposits on indoor surfaces can be as complex and diverse as the indoor environments in which they exist. Dust loading can range over several orders of magnitude, suggesting the existence of different types of particle deposits. These deposits can be broadly classified as either a monolayer, in which particles are sparsely deposited on a surface, or a multilayer, in which particles are deposited on top of one another and there is particle-to-particle adhesion and interaction. Particles within these diverse structures of settled indoor dust can become airborne through a process known as resuspension, which can occur due to airflow in ventilation ducts or human activity indoors. The dust loading and deposit structure on an indoor surface may have important implications for resuspension in the indoor environment. This literature review provides a summary of dust loads found on indoor surfaces in field studies and classifies each dust load as either a monolayer or multilayer particle deposit. The article highlights the unique attributes associated with resuspension from both types of particle deposits by summarizing key findings of the experimental resuspension literature. The fundamental differences in the resuspension process between monolayer and multilayer deposits suggest that resuspension may vary considerably among the broad spectrum of dust loads found on indoor surfaces. Copyright 2013 American Association for Aerosol Research

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据