4.5 Article

Pollution Gradients and Chemical Characterization of Particulate Matter from Vehicular Traffic near Major Roadways: Results from the 2009 Queens College Air Quality Study in NYC

期刊

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 1201-1218

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2012.701784

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy (DoE) [DE-F602-07ER]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present measurements of traffic-related pollutants made near the Long Island Expressway (LIE, I-495), in Queens, New York. The Aerodyne Research Inc. (ARI) mobile laboratory (AML) was deployed to map spatial and temporal gradients of gas-phase species and particulate matter (PM) associated with vehicular exhaust in the residential areas near the LIE. We observe that pollutant levels build up during the early morning hours under stable boundary layer conditions yet fall off quickly within 150 m downwind of the highway. An ARI soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS) provided measurements of the size-resolved chemical composition of refractory black carbon (rBC) and the associated coating species. The average size distribution of the traffic related PM is characterized by a rBC mode centered at similar to 100 nm in vacuum aerodynamic diameter, D-va (rBC mass fraction similar to 50%). A second rBC mode (rBC mass fraction similar to 5%) more heavily coated with organic material is also observed at D-va similar to 500 nm. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) analyses of the traffic-related PM indicates that rBC is mostly associated with hydrocarbon-like organic (HOA) PM. These results are discussed in the context of chemically resolved size distributions and PMF analysis results performed on the SP-AMS stationary data collected at the Queens College site. Finally, we report emission indices (EI) for both fleet-average conditions and single vehicles, including several New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) buses, sampled by the AML in chase mode during the study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据