4.5 Article

The Effects of Mainstream and Sidestream Environmental Tobacco Smoke Composition for Enhanced Condensational Droplet Growth by Water Vapor

期刊

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 760-766

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2012.663949

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1032388]
  2. Directorate For Engineering [1032388] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although tobacco smoke is well known for its adverse health effects, the hygroscopicity and droplet growth properties of the aerosol have not been thoroughly explored. In this study, cigarette smoke is further characterized and several state-of-art analysis techniques are applied to understand the effects of particle chemistry and hygroscopicity for enhanced condensational growth (ECG) by water vapor and wet particle deposition. Low nicotine (LN) and ultra-low nicotine (ULN) research cigarettes are tested with a Walton Smoking Machine (WSM); mainstream and sidestream environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) are produced. Online and offline analysis are combined to analyze the smoke. More than 99% of the mainstream and sidestream ETS mass is semivolatile aerosol and nonelemental carbon, of which more than 95% is organic. The water-soluble organic comprises 30-85% of the aerosol mass fraction and has no effect on surface tension when dissolved in water. The oxygen-to-carbon ratio (O/C) and nitrogen-to-carbon ratio (N/C) from High Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS or HR-AMS) data show that more oxidized components are present in mainstream smoke. Differences in the bulk aerosol composition have little effect on the overall water uptake. The two types of cigarettes produce aerosols of similar hygroscopicity (with single hygroscopicity parameter,. similar to 0.15 or less) in mainstream and sidestream smoke. Droplets grow at the same rate within the instrument. However, ULN reference cigarettes that produce dry particles at larger sizes are more likely to experience ECG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据