4.5 Article

Seasonal Variability of Atmospheric Aerosol Parameters over Greater Noida Using Ground Sunphotometer Observations

期刊

AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 608-622

出版社

TAIWAN ASSOC AEROSOL RES-TAAR
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.06.0219

关键词

Atmospheric aerosols; Sunphotometer; Aerosol optical depth; Dust storm; AERONET; Dust; Biomass burning

资金

  1. Chapman University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric aerosols over northern India are subject of significant temporal and spatial variability and many studies have been carried out to investigate their physico-chemical and optical properties. The present work emphasizes on examining the aerosol optical properties and types over Greater Noida, Delhi region, using ground-based sun photometer data during the period 2010-2012. The analysis reveals a relatively high mean aerosol optical depth at 500 nm (AOD(500) = 0.82 +/- 0.39), associated with a moderate Angstrom exponent alpha(440-870) of 0.95 +/- 0.37. Both parameters, exhibit significant daily, monthly and seasonal variability with higher values of AOD(500) during post-monsoon (0.98 +/- 0.50) and winter (0.87 +/- 0.35) seasons associated with high a values (> 1.1) suggesting significant urban and biomass-burning contribution. On monthly basis, the highest AOD is found during July and November and the lowest one in the transition months of March and September. The aerosol-type discrimination via the relationship AOD vs. a shows a clear dominance of urban/industrial and biomass-burning aerosols during post-monsoon and winter in fractions of 74.5% and 72%, respectively, while aerosols of desert-dust characteristics were most frequent in pre-monsoon (41.7%) and monsoon (21%) seasons. In general, the analysis shows a rather well-mixed aerosol type under very turbid atmosphere, which is associated with the long range transport of pollutants through the westerly winds from the Thar desert and biomass burning in the western parts of India.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据