4.7 Article

Analysis of coupling errors in a physically-based integrated surface water-groundwater model

期刊

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 86-96

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.019

关键词

Surface-subsurface interactions; Mass balance errors; Boundary conditions; Integrated hydrological modeling; Coupled systems; Sequential coupling scheme

资金

  1. INRA (MRI)
  2. INRA Department Environment and Agronomy
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB/TR32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several physically-based models that couple 1D or 2D surface and 3D subsurface flow have recently been developed, but few studies have evaluated the errors directly associated with the different coupling schemes. In this paper we analyze the causes of mass balance error for a conventional and a modified sequential coupling scheme in worst-case scenario simulations of Hortonian runoff generation on a sloping plane catchment. The conventional scheme is noniterative, whereas for the modified scheme the surface-subsurface exchange fluxes are determined via a boundary condition switching procedure that is performed iteratively during resolution of the nonlinear subsurface flow equation. It is shown that the modified scheme generates much lower coupling mass balance errors than the conventional sequential scheme. While both coupling schemes are sensitive to time discretization, the iterative control of infiltration in the modified scheme greatly limits its sensitivity to temporal resolution. Little sensitivity to spatial discretization is observed for both schemes. For the modified scheme the different factors contributing to coupling error are isolated, and the error is observed to be highly correlated to the flood recession duration. More testing, under broader hydrologic contexts and including other coupling schemes, is recommended so that the findings from this first analysis of coupling errors can be extended to other surface water-groundwater models. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据