4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Distributed hydrological modelling using weather radar in gauged and ungauged basins

期刊

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1107-1120

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.01.006

关键词

Distributed hydrological modelling; Ungauged; Weather radar; Raingauge; Rainfall estimation; Multiquadric; Flood forecasting

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010022] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distributed hydrological modelling using space-time estimates of rainfall from weather radar provides a natural approach to area-wide flood forecasting and warning at any location, whether gauged or ungauged. However, radar estimates of rainfall may lack consistent, quantitative accuracy. Also, the formulation of hydrological models in distributed form may be problematic due to process complexity and scaling issues. Here, the aim is to first explore ways of improving radar rainfall accuracy through combination with raingauge network data via integrated multiquadric methods. When the resulting gridded rainfall estimates are employed as input to hydrological models, the simulated river flows show marked improvements when compared to using radar data alone. Secondly, simple forms of physical-conceptual distributed hydrological model are considered, capable of exploiting spatial datasets on topography and, where necessary, land-cover, soil and geology properties. The simplest Grid-to-Grid model uses only digital terrain data to delineate flow pathways and to control runoff production, the latter by invoking a probability-distributed relation linking terrain slope to soil absorption capacity. Model performance is assessed over nested river basins in northwest England, employing a lumped model as a reference. When the distributed model is used with the gridded radar-based rainfall estimators, it shows particular benefits for forecasting at ungauged locations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据