4.6 Article

The impact of microwave absorber and radome geometries on GNSS measurements of station coordinates and atmospheric water vapour

期刊

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 186-196

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2010.06.023

关键词

GNSS antennas; Multipath; Microwave absorbing material; Radome; Atmospheric water vapour; Water Vapour Radiometer

资金

  1. VINNOVA, the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems [P29459-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have used microwave absorbing material in different geometries around ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antennas in order to mitigate multipath effects on the estimates of station coordinates and atmospheric water vapour. The influence of a hemispheric radome - of the same type as in the Swedish GPS network SWEPOS was - also investigated. Two GNSS stations at the Onsala Space Observatory were used forming a 12 m baseline. GPS data from October 2008 to November 2009 were analyzed by the GIPSY/OASIS II software using the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) processing strategy for five different elevation cutoff angles from 5 degrees to 25 degrees. We found that the use of the absorbing material decreases the offset in the estimated vertical component of the baseline from similar to 27 mm to similar to 4 mm when the elevation cutoff angle varies from 5 degrees to 20 degrees. The horizontal components are much less affected. The corresponding offset in the estimates of the atmospheric Integrated Water Vapour (IWV) decreases from similar to 1.6 kg/m(2) to similar to 0.3kg/m(2). Changes less than 5 mm in the offsets in the vertical component of the baseline are seen for all five elevation cutoff angle solutions when the antenna was covered by a hemispheric radome. Using the radome affects the IWV estimates less than 0.4 kg/m(2) for all different solutions. IWV comparisons between a Water Vapour Radiometer (WVR) and the GPS data give consistent results. (C) 2010 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据