4.6 Article

Determination of parameters of meteor bodies based on flight observational data

期刊

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 323-334

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.03.030

关键词

Analytical model; Ballistic coefficient; Dynamic mass

资金

  1. COSPAR
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [07-01-00009, 07-08-00247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, an analytical model of the atmospheric entry is calculated using the altitude and the rate of the meteor body deceleration in the atmosphere from the data of actual observations. With this purpose the strict mathematical algorithm to find basic dynamic parameters of the theoretical relationship between the height and the velocity of the body that help to fit observations along the luminous part of the trajectories in the best way is suggested. The detailed review of the existing approaches to the decision of this problem is presented in the related work by the writer [Gritsevich, M.I. Fireballs masses and densities: hypotheses and reality, in: 37th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Montreal, Canada, 13-20 July 2008, B04-0041-08, 2008a]. The basic goal of the present study mainly consists in the qualitative description of the universal technique for processing of the meteor body flight observational data. The main difference from previous studies [e.g., Gritsevich, M.I., Stulov, V.P. Entry mass for Bolides of the Canadian Network. Doki. Akad. Nauk 413, 4, 472-477, 2007a (Phys. Dokl. (Engl. Transl.) 52, 4, 219-224); Gritsevich, M.I. Determination of the Extra-atmospheric Bolides Masses of the Canadian Network. Publishing House of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of the Moscow State University (in Russian), 2007] is that the given observations are approximated using the analytical solution of the fundamental differential equations of the meteor physics. As for today the method allows to determine parameters of meteor bodies with the high accuracy of estimate. (C) 2009 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据