4.6 Article

Photolytic behaviour of methane at Lyman-α and 248 nm: Studies in the frame of a simulation program of Titan's atmosphere (SETUP)

期刊

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 2036-2044

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2008.04.011

关键词

Photochemistry; Titan's atmosphere; Experimental simulations; CRDS technique

资金

  1. French Spatial Agency (CNES)
  2. CNRS (INSU)
  3. Programme National de Planetologie (PNP)
  4. Region Ile de France (SESAME)
  5. University Paris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper first describes briefly some of the forefront global simulations of Titan's atmosphere that have been carried out up to now. In these experiments, an initial gaseous mixture of N-2/CH4 is submitted to a single energy source and the retrieved gas and/or solid phase(s) is/are analyzed by different techniques. The second section presents a new simulation program, named S.E.T.U.P., currently under development in our laboratory. In this program, all original experimental device will be used to perform simulation experiments. The specificities of this device are also discussed into details in the second part. Indeed, it will allow: (i) to improve the representativeness of such simulation experiments towards Titan's atmospheric conditions. For the first time, the initial gas Mixture will be submitted to both major energy sources that are responsible for the chemical evolution of Titan's atmosphere: electrons and photons (248 nm). (ii) to perform an in situ diagnostic by means of time resolved spectroscopy. Qualitative its well as quantitative analysis will be performed in order to investigate the chemical mechanisms involved in the evolution of the gaseous mixture. In a third part, the paper reports some studies on the photolytic behaviour of methane at Lyman-alpha and at 248 rim. Indeed, such a work was necessary to validate the experimental device that will be used to carry out the Titan's simulations in the S.E.T.U.P. program. (C) 2008 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据