4.2 Article

The influence of endurance training intensity on dynamics of post-exertional heart rate recovery adaptation in patients with ischemic heart disease

期刊

ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SCIENCES
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 50-57

出版社

MEDICAL UNIV BIALYSTOK
DOI: 10.2478/v10039-012-0073-z

关键词

cardiac rehabilitation; heart rate recovery; endurance training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The intensity of post-exertion heart rate recovery, evaluated in the first minute of the recovery period (HRR60), is considered to be a strong predictor of risk for cardiac death. Intensification of physical activity performed as part of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) increases the HRR60 value in ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients. In this context, the impact of endurance training intensity (ETI) on change in HRR60 intensity seems to be an interesting issue. Material/Methods: The study group consisted of 251 patients who were subjected to a CR cycle. 45 patients of this group participated in CR twice. The control group consisted of 35 patients who were not subjected to any CR. ETI was estimated by the training work. In all patients an exertion test on a treadmill was performed twice within six months, analyzing the initial and final HRR60 value and.HRR60. Results: After a six-month observation, there was a statistically significant increase in the HRR60 value (17.98 +/- 8.33/min vs. 22.72 +/- 7.72/min, p<0.01) in the test group, which was not observed in the control group. Mean Delta HRR60 value in the test group was statistically significantly greater than in the control group. In the subgroup subjected to the two CR cycles, only the first cycle led to a statistically significant increase in the mean HRR60 value. Conclusions: A six-month CR cycle significantly increased the HRR60 value, while cardiac training intensity did not affect the exertion-evoked change in its intensity. Continuation of the CR cycle beyond 6 months no longer significantly affected the change in the HRR60 alue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据