3.8 Article

What is sternness?

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.09.002

关键词

Dedifferentiation; Entity theory; State theory; Transdifferentiation

资金

  1. Academic Senate
  2. Center for Society and Genetics
  3. Law School Dean's Fund at University of California, Los Angeles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper, addressed to both philosophers of science and stem cell biologists, aims to reduce the obscurity of and disagreements over the nature of stemness. The two most prominent current theories of stemness-the entity theory and the state theory-are both biologically and philosophically unsatisfactory. Improved versions of these theories are likely to converge. Philosophers of science can perform a much needed service in clarifying and formulating ways of testing entity and state theories of stemness. To do so, however, philosophers should acquaint themselves with the latest techniques and approaches employed by bench scientists, such as the use of proteomics, genome-wide association studies, and ChIP-on-chip arrays. An overarching theme of this paper is the desirability of bringing closer together the philosophy of science and the practice of scientific research. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据