3.8 Article

The Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cell

期刊

CLINICAL LYMPHOMA & MYELOMA
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 S376-S381

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.3816/CLM.2009.s.037

关键词

Fingolimod; FTY720; Hematopoiesis; Imatinib; Leukemogenesis; Parthenolide; Quiescent stem cells; TDZD-8

类别

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  2. ChemGenex Pharmaceuticals
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal stem cell disorder that is characterized by the acquired chromosomal translocation BCR-ABL. This gives rise to a constitutively active tyrosine kinase deregulation of the normal mechanisms of cell cycle control. In the normal hematopoietic system, hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) self-renew to form identical daughter cells but also differentiate to mature blood cells. Leukemic stem cells (LSC) share these properties of self-renewal and also differentiate to mature leukemic cells. LSC have been isolated from patients with CML: these cells give rise to leukemia following transplantation into NOD-SCID mice models. Further characterization of CML stem cells has demonstrated that a small percentage of these cells are quiescent despite culture with growth factors. The CML stem cell arises from a normal HSC that has acquired the Philadelphia chromosome. In advanced phase, more mature cells such as granulocyte/monocyte progenitors might also acquire the ability to self-renew and function as LSC. This might be one of the mechanisms underlying the progression to blast crisis. Quiescent stem cells are resistant to treatment with imatinib in vitro and are thought also to show resistance in vivo. The properties of the stem cells that lead to this drug resistance are still being characterized. However, this drug insensitivity leads to disease persistence that may lead to disease relapse even despite an initial response to imatinib. Newer molecular therapies are in development that act to specifically target and eradicate the stem cell pool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据