4.5 Article

Increased proliferation and adhesion properties of human dental pulp stem cells in PLGA scaffolds via simulated microgravity

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 161-173

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iej.12441

关键词

dental pulp stem cells; microgravity; PLGA; real-time PCR array

资金

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China [81271132, 81001211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimTo explore the possibility of utilizing a rotary cell culture system (RCCS) to model simulated microgravity and investigate its effects on the proliferation, adhesion, migration and cytoskeletal organization of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) on poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds. MethodologyIsolated and identified hDPSCs grown on PLGA scaffolds were exposed to simulated microgravity (SMG) or normal gravity (NG) conditions for 3days. MTT cell proliferation assays, BrdU incorporation assays, flow cytometry analysis and Western blotting were undertaken to identify the proliferation ability of hDPSCs under SMG conditions. Additionally, immunofluorescence detection, SEM observations and cell migration and adhesion assays were performed to compare adhesion, migration and cytoskeletal changes in hDPCSs subjected to SMG conditions. To further investigate the mechanisms, human pathway-focused matrix and adhesion PCR array analyses were performed. The Student's t-test was used for statistical analyses. ResultsSMG promoted proliferation and adhesion, decreased migration and reorganized the cytoskeletal organization of hDPSCs compared with the NG group. PCR array analyses revealed that following SMG treatment, ITGA6 (integrin alpha-6), ITGAV (integrin alpha-V), ITGB1 (integrin beta-1), LAMB1 (laminin beta-1) and TNC (tenascin-C) were significantly upregulated (P<0.05). ConclusionsSMG may regulate the behaviour of hDPSCs grown in PLGA scaffolds in an integrin-mediated manner, which may contribute to tooth tissue engineering by increasing their expandability and scaffold adhesion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据