期刊
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 237-248出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-009-9049-1
关键词
Spacing; Metacognition; Studying; Learning; Flashcards
Learners of all ages face complex decisions about how to study effectively. Here we investigated three such decisions made in concert-time allocation, ordering, and spacing. First, college students were presented with, and made judgments of learning about, 16 word-synonym pairs. Then, when presented with all 16 pairs, they created their own study schedule by choosing when and how long to study each item. The results indicated that (a) the most study time was allocated to difficult items, (b) relatively easy items tended to be studied first, and (c) participants spaced their study at a rate significantly greater than chance. The spacing data, which are of particular interest, differ from previous findings that have suggested that people, including adults, believe massing is more effective than spacing.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据