4.7 Article

Experimental investigation and model development for effective viscosity of Al2O3-glycerol nanofluids by using dimensional analysis and GMDH-NN methods

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.09.002

关键词

Nanofluid; Viscosity; Al2O3-glycerol; GMDH; Neural network; Dimensional analysis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF)
  2. Stellenbosch University/University of Pretoria Solar Hub
  3. CSIR
  4. EEDSM Hub
  5. NAC
  6. RDP-seed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanofluids are new heat transfer fluids which aimed to improve the poor heat removal efficiency of conventional heat transfer fluids. The dispersion of nanoparticles into traditional heat transfer fluids such as ethylene glycol, glycerol, engine oil, gear oil and water has become widely applicable in engineering systems because of their superior heat transfer properties. However, viscosity increase due to nanoparticle dispersion is an issue which needs attention and proper experimental investigation. Therefore, in this study, it is experimentally optimized the two-step preparation procedure for Al2O3-glycerol nanofluids consisting of 19, 139 and 160 nm particle sizes, and then studied the effective viscosity between 20 and 70 degrees C for the range of 0 to 5% volume fractions. The nanofluids' viscosity showed a characteristic increase as volume fraction increases; decrease as the working temperature increases; and the smallest nanoparticles showed the highest shear resistance. Based on the available experimental data, an empirical correlation has been offered using dimensional analysis. Thereafter, a hybrid neural network based on the group method of data handling (GMDH-NN) has been employed for modeling the effective viscosity of Al2O3-glycerol nanofluid. The correlations obtained from both modeling procedures showed higher accuracy in the prediction of the present experimental data when compared to most cited models from the open literature. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据