4.7 Article

Solubility and interaction parameters as references for solution properties. I. Exceptional mixing and excess functions

期刊

ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 146, 期 1-2, 页码 31-41

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.007

关键词

Solubility parameter; Exchange energy density parameter; Interchange cohesive pressure parameter; Work of adhesive pressure interaction; Interaction parameter; Energy of mixing; Excess energy; Combinatory energy; Residual energy

资金

  1. Foundation for Abo Akademi University
  2. Academy of Finland to Center of Excellence for Functional Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to focus on salient interactions it is Customary to design a parameter network representing the reference (ideal) molecular behavior. Such reference properties are subtracted from the experimental data and the difference is analyzed. Each network is based on generally agreed thermodynamic dependent and independent variables defining unambiguously the state of the system. Unfortunately, more correction terms have been introduced making the relationship with traditional thermodynamic networks dependent on each system investigated. A critical comparison is made on the conceptual constraints introduced when developing the two most utilized reference thermodynamic networks. The first is represented by the standard mixing and excess functions of Gibbs free energy. The second represents tailored models involving van der Waals liquids and polymer solutions. Although the mixing and excess functions are formally same, their definition varies dramatically. Unfortunately this influences the analysis of divergence from the reference function, resulting in serious consequences as shown by the entropy and enthalpy obtained from temperature dependency. Moreover, entirely new functions relating to multiple solubility parameters in excess of standard van der Waals behaviorare developed since reference data for these models are easily accessible. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据