4.6 Article

Predictability of the East Asian winter monsoon interannual variability as indicated by the DEMETER CGCMS

期刊

ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 441-454

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-011-1115-3

关键词

East Asian winter monsoon; interannual variability; DEMETER; hindcast

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB421406]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41130103, 40821092]
  3. Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry (Meteorology) [GYHY200906018]
  4. Norwegian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interannual variability of East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM) circulation from the Development of a European Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) System for Seasonal to Inter-Annual Prediction (DEMETER) hindcasts was evaluated against observation reanalysis data. We evaluated the DEMETER coupled general circulation models (CGCMs)' retrospective prediction of the typical EAWM and its associated atmospheric circulation. Results show that the EAWM can be reasonably predicted with statistically significant accuracy, yet the major bias of the hindcast models is the underestimation of the related anomalies. The temporal correlation coefficient (TCC) of the MME-produced EAWM index, defined as the first EOF mode of 850-hPa air temperature within the EAWM domain (20A degrees aEuro60A degrees N, 90A degrees aEuro150A degrees E), was 0.595. This coefficient was higher than those of the corresponding individual models (range: 0.39-0.51) for the period 1969-2001; this result indicates the advantage of the super-ensemble approach. This study also showed that the ensemble models can reasonably reproduce the major modes and their interannual variabilities for sea level pressure, geopotential height, surface air temperature, and wind fields in Eurasia. Therefore, the prediction of EAWM interannual variability is feasible using multimodel ensemble systems and that they may also reveal the associated mechanisms of the EAWM interannual variability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据