4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Understanding ultrafiltration membrane fouling by soluble microbial product and effluent organic matter using fluorescence excitation-emission matrix coupled with parallel factor analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.01.011

关键词

Soluble microbial product (SMP); Effluent organic matter (EfOM); Ultrafiltration (UF); Excitation-emission matrix (EEM); Parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51138008]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0169]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment [2014DX04]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Chancheng District [2013A1044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane fouling of soluble microbial product (SMP) and effluent organic matter (EfOM) in ultrafiltration (UF) was investigated by using fluorescence excitation emission matrix coupled with parallel factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC) as well as dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and polysaccharides measurement. SMP and EfOM samples were generated in bench-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) fed with synthetic wastewater and domestic wastewater under different solid retention times (SRTs). Results showed that EfOM contained more DOC and more sub-fractional components except for tyrosine-like substances compared to SMP, however, SMP caused more severe fouling. The fluorescence intensity of tyrosine-like substances in UF feed showed good correlation with membrane fouling index, suggesting that it can serve as a fouling potential indicator. The mass balance analysis also indicated that the tyrosine-like substances was a major foulant. Membrane fouling was alleviated as SRT increased, which can be associated with the decrease of protein-like (tyrosine-like and tryptophan-like) substances under longer SRT. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据