4.7 Article

Polymer-Supported Electron-Rich Oxime Palladacycle as an Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Suzuki Coupling Reaction

期刊

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
卷 356, 期 5, 页码 1056-1064

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201300499

关键词

electron-rich ligands; heterogeneous catalysts; oxime palladacycles; Suzuki coupling reaction; valsartan synthesis

资金

  1. WCU (World Class University) program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [R32-2010-000-10213-0]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  3. Pioneer Research Center Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2013006141]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [R32-2010-000-10213-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various electron-rich oxime palladacycle resins designed as heterogeneous catalysts were employed for the Suzuki coupling reaction of aryl halides with arylboronic acids. The electron-richness of the oxime ligand was controlled by the substituted alkoxy groups. Evaluation based on the electronic effect of the catalysts revealed that the alkoxy-substituted oxime palladacycle resins showed better catalytic activity than palladated Kaiser oxime resin in the Suzuki coupling reactions and that the catalytic activity of oxime palladacycle resins increased as the electron-richness of oxime ligand increased. The most electron-rich oxime palladacycle resin exhibited an excellent catalytic performance for the synthesis of both biaryl and heterobiaryl compounds, despite its heterogeneous system. As a practical application of the catalyst, a valsartan precursor was synthesized in high yield under mild conditions. The electron-rich oxime resin could also be reused for up to 5 cycles while maintaining good catalytic activity in the Suzuki coupling reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据