4.6 Article

Combined Treatment with Bevacizumab and 5-Fluorouracil Attenuates the Postoperative Scarring Response after Experimental Glaucoma Filtration Surgery

期刊

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3949

关键词

-

资金

  1. Singapore National Eye Centre [R569/57/2007]
  2. National Research Foundation [R617/38/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the use of combined bevacizumab with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on postoperative scarring and bleb survival after experimental glaucoma filtration surgery in comparison to the agents alone. METHODS. Filtration surgery was performed on 26 female New Zealand White rabbits. The rabbits were allocated to one of four treatments: 5-FU combined with bevacizumab, 5-FU alone, bevacizumab alone, or phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The subconjunctival injections were administered immediate post-operatively and weekly for 3 weeks. Clinical assessment and bleb photography were performed. Histologic staining determined the presence of subconjunctvial fibrosis and mRNA expression of collagen I and fibronectin in the tissue was quantified. RESULTS. Bevacizumab in combination with 5-FU resulted in a greater antifibrotic effect compared with monotherapy with 5-FU or bevacizumab alone, as evidenced by the attenuation in fibronectin and mature collagen I expression and deposition (P < 0.05). In addition, this was associated with a 100% bleb survival at day 28 in the combined treatment group compared with monotherapy (50% bevacizumab [P < 0.05] and 25% 5-FU [P < 0.001]). Conjunctival vascularity significantly reduced with bevacizumab treatment both alone and in combination with 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS. The results provide compelling evidence that combined bevacizumab and 5-FU offers superior antifibrotic effect over monotherapy in a model of glaucoma filtration surgery, while prolonging bleb survival at the same time. A synergistic effect is suggested to be present. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 928-932) DOI:10.1167/iovs.09-3949

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据