4.7 Article

An Alternative to Nitromethane as Solvent: The Promoting Influence of Nitro-Functionalized Imidazolium Salts for Synthesis and Catalysis

期刊

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
卷 353, 期 18, 页码 3473-3484

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201100530

关键词

nitro-functionalized imidazolium salts; oxidative coupling of alkynes; ring-opening of dihydropyran with nucleophiles; trimethylsilylation of alcohols with hexamethyldisilazane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20903042]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20090142120081]
  3. Program for new Century Excellent Talents in the University of China [NCET-10-0383]
  4. Hubei provincial government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitromethane, a volatile and toxic organic compound, is commonly used as solvent for organic and catalytic reactions. In order to find an alternative for this specific nitro-containing organic solvent, the performance of some nitro-functionalized imidazolium salts such as 1-methyl-3-(4-nitrobenzyl)imidazolium hexafluorophosphate, 1-methyl-3-(4-nitrobenzyl)imidazolium tetrafluoroborate, 1-methyl-3-(4-nitrobenzyl)imidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide and 1,2-dimethyl-3-(4- nitrobenzyl)imidazolium hexafluorophosphate, was examined in some reactions including trimethylsilylation of alcohols with hexamethyldisilazane, ring-opening reactions of 2-aryl-3,4-dihydropyrans with thiophenols or thiols, and a copper- mediated oxidative coupling of alkynes. As expected, these imidazolium salts can indeed replace nitromethane in these reactions. Particularly, the imidazolium salt along with the metal catalyst, if involved, can be easily recovered and reused without significant loss of activity. The use of these nitro-functionalized imidazolium salts as alternative solvents for nitromethane not only confers a green aspect to the reaction system, but also facilitates a rational design of a catalytic system with the concept of green chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据